The comparison is really about size
Agencies rarely short-list these two because they look alike. They short-list them because they are at the point where the question is no longer “which ABA platform” but “how much platform do we actually need”.
CentralReach sells breadth: one system intended to carry an agency from intake through claim submission and remittance, with a decade of accumulated depth aimed at large, multi-site organizations. Office Puzzle is positioned at the smaller and mid-sized end of the same market, where that breadth is a cost rather than a feature — the depth an eighty-clinician agency needs is overhead for a twelve-clinician one.
So the honest framing is not which product is better. It is whether you are buying a system to grow into or a system to run today.
What to compare them on
A frame for your own evaluation, not a verdict. We hold no dated public source on Office Puzzle, so its column is left for you to fill in on the demo call.
| MegAligna | Office Puzzle | CentralReach | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Published pricing | Yes | No | No |
| Priced per active clinical seat, clients free | Yes | Ask the vendor | Ask the vendor |
| Modules in the plan 3 | One plan, everything in it | Ask the vendor | Ask the vendor |
| Direct electronic claim submission 4 | No | Ask the vendor | Yes |
- 3 The size question in one row. Count the modules you would open in a normal week, then ask each vendor to quote only those — a quote that includes what you were shown in the demo describes the demo, not your agency.
- 4 CentralReach's breadth includes claim submission and remittance, and this is the row where we lose outright. If your agency files its own claims electronically, rule us out here and spend the time on the other two.
Take the size framing into both demos. The questions that separate a system you grow into from one you outgrow are these:
- Which modules are in the quote, and which would a team our size open in a normal week?
- What does the quote become at twice our headcount — and at half?
- Who configures the system on day one, and is that a separate line?
- How long does leaving take, and what does the export actually contain?
The second question is the one to write down. The answer matters at renewal, which is exactly when nobody remembers what was said on the sales call.
Where MegAligna fits, and where it does not
If size is the real question, a third answer is a system priced so that size stops changing the rate: MegAligna publishes its prices and charges per active clinical seat, so a twelve-clinician agency and an eighty-clinician one pay the same per person, and clients are never counted. Technicians keep working through a dropped connection, because in-progress session data is held on the device.
The gap is precisely the thing CentralReach is strongest at. We do not transmit claims to payers — charges leave for your biller as an export, and the CMS-1500 field guide shows what that export carries. An agency that files its own claims, depends on something a decade-old platform has built and we have not, or is mid-audit should stay where it is.
Common questions
Which one is cheaper, Office Puzzle or CentralReach?
Is Office Puzzle a full CentralReach replacement?
Is CentralReach private-equity owned?
Can we pilot a smaller system alongside CentralReach?
See how much system you actually need
14 days, no card required. Use made-up patients while you evaluate — real patient information waits until a business associate agreement is in place.