Skip to content
MegAligna

Product

Scheduling Clinical notes Intake Patient portal Billing Reporting

ABA

ABA therapy software ABA scheduling ABA data collection Supervision calculator

Compare

All comparisons CentralReach alternative CentralReach vs Rethink Office Puzzle vs CentralReach Noteable vs CentralReach CentralReach pricing Office Puzzle vs Aloha ABA Motivity alternative Office Puzzle vs ABA Matrix Office Puzzle vs Motivity Office Puzzle vs Rethink Raven alternative TherapyNotes alternative SimplePractice alternative Jane alternative WebPT alternative Apollo PT pricing MWTherapy pricing ChiroTouch alternative Genesis Chiropractic Platinum Chiropractic

Switch

Migrating your data From CentralReach From Motivity From Raven From TherapyNotes From SimplePractice From Jane From WebPT

Free tools

All free tools All guides All templates 8-minute rule calculator Superbill generator The 8-minute rule Superbill vs CMS-1500 CMS-1500 field guide Superbill template Patient intake form ABA session note SOAP, DAP and BIRP notes Authorization tracker
Pricing
About Contact
Start free trial

Product

Medical coding software inside practice management

Most medical coding software is a reference tool a coder opens beside their work. MegAligna takes the other approach: code search at the point of charge entry inside the practice management system, so procedure and diagnosis codes attach to the encounter that produced them and reach the superbill without being typed twice.

Start free trial See pricing

How this differs from a coding tool

Is this a code lookup tool?
No. A coder working through a queue of charts wants a reference product with full descriptors, guidelines and cross-references. This is code search where the charge is entered, for clinicians and billers who need the right code attached to a session rather than a research surface.
Why does charge capture matter separately from billing?
Because the gap between what happened and what got recorded is where revenue and audit exposure both live. Capturing codes, units, modifiers and place of service on the encounter itself removes the reconstruction step where errors enter.
Does it check codes against payer edit rules?
Not in this version. Edit checking is most valuable immediately before submission, and submission is not something this version does. It is planned alongside claim submission rather than ahead of it.
Where should I look for a coding reference instead?
Coder-workstation products handle lookup, guideline text and cross-references properly, and that is a genuinely different job from this one.

Codes attached to the encounter that produced them

  • Included

    In-context code search

    Search at the point of charge entry, scoped to the codes your practice actually uses rather than the full code set.

  • Included

    Units, modifiers and place of service

    Captured on the charge line with the rendering and supervising provider, so the artifacts generated later do not need reconstructing.

  • Included

    Fee schedules

    Per-payer fee schedules applied at charge generation, so the amount on a superbill is the amount you meant to charge.

  • Roadmap · v1.x

    Service presets and coder favorites

    Storing a common service as a reusable code, modifier and unit template — most practices bill a small, repeating set, and today each one is picked fresh every time.

  • Not included · v2

    Payer edit rule checking

    Planned alongside claim submission rather than before it, since edit checks are only actionable at the point a claim is transmitted.

  • Not included

    Autonomous AI coding

    Not offered. Codes are not assigned on your behalf from the text of a note; a clinician or coder selects them.

Where to look up codes instead

Full descriptor text, coding guidelines, cross-references and edit rules are the job of a dedicated coder-workstation product, and a practice doing volume coding work should keep one. Those tools are built for research: working a queue of charts, resolving ambiguous documentation, checking guideline text before assigning.

Charge capture here is the complement rather than the replacement. It records the codes a clinician or biller has already decided on, attached to the encounter that produced them, with the units, modifiers and place of service that belong to the same session. The reference tool answers “which code is correct”; the practice management system answers “which session was it for, and did it reach the superbill”.

Where those fields end up is worth knowing before you evaluate any of this: the CMS-1500 field guide covers the boxes a captured charge has to fill, and billing covers what happens to the charge once it exists.

Try it end to end with test data

14 days, no card required. Use made-up patients while you evaluate — real patient information waits until a business associate agreement is in place.

Start a 14-day free trial