Skip to content
MegAligna

Specialties

Speech therapy billing software for private SLP practices

Speech therapy billing software turns documented sessions into billable charges: untimed evaluation and treatment codes, timed codes where the contract uses them, and the superbill an out-of-network family submits. MegAligna builds the charge from the note and hands it to your biller — it does not transmit claims to payers.

SLP billing is session-based, and that changes the software

Physical and occupational therapy bill in 15-minute increments, so their software is built around counting minutes. Most speech-language pathology treatment does not: the common treatment and evaluation codes are per-session and untimed, billed once regardless of whether the session ran forty minutes or sixty.

Software written for timed-unit disciplines handles this badly. It asks for minutes it will not use, invites a therapist to record a duration that implies a unit count nobody will bill, and leaves the actual billing risk — frequency limits, plan caps, what the evaluation covered — entirely unmodelled.

What matters in SLP billing is that the session happened, that the documentation supports the code chosen, and that the visit lands on a claim or a superbill before the plan’s limit or the authorization period runs out.

The note is the charge

The charge is produced from the treatment note rather than entered next to it. One record carries the date, the code, the rendering provider and the documentation that justifies it, so the thing billed and the thing documented cannot describe different sessions.

Where a contract does use timed codes, the minutes on the note drive the units under that payer’s rule. Where it does not, no minute count is invented to satisfy a field.

Out-of-network is the normal case

A large share of private SLP practice is out of network by choice, which puts the superbill at the centre of the revenue model rather than at its edge. Families pay at the visit and seek reimbursement themselves, and a superbill missing a diagnosis pointer, the rendering NPI or the correct code is a claim the family loses.

The superbill and the biller export come from the same visit data, so improving one cannot silently break the other. Superbill and CMS-1500 PDF output follows completion of AMA CPT licensing.

The note the charge comes from is the subject of SLP documentation software. For the timed-code arithmetic itself, the 8-minute rule covers which rule applies and what does not count toward the total.

Common questions

Does it handle teletherapy sessions?
Sessions carry a place of service and a telehealth flag that follow onto the charge, which is what a payer looks at. The video itself is not embedded — practices bring their own platform under their own BAA. Which codes a payer will reimburse over telehealth varies by contract and is a per-payer setting.
Can it track authorization or visit limits?
Yes. Authorized visits or units are tracked per client against what has been scheduled and what has been delivered, with the warning raised at booking rather than at month end. Plans that cap visits per year behave the same way as an authorization for this purpose.
What about school contracts and early intervention?
Place of service is recorded on the visit and carried to the charge, and payer records hold which places of service that programme accepts. What a specific state early-intervention programme requires on its paperwork is not modelled as a preset, because those requirements differ by state and change.
Do we need a separate documentation system?
No. Notes, treatment plans and the charge are one record in MegAligna, which is the point — a separate documentation system is what creates the re-keying and the mismatch between what was written and what was billed.

Try it end to end with test data

14 days, no card required. Use made-up patients while you evaluate — real patient information waits until a business associate agreement is in place.